Creative License: The Law and Culture of Digital SamplingHow did the Depression-era folk-song collector Alan Lomax end up with a songwriting credit on Jay-Z’s song “Takeover”? Why doesn’t Clyde Stubblefield, the primary drummer on James Brown recordings from the late 1960s such as “Funky Drummer” and “Cold Sweat,” get paid for other musicians’ frequent use of the beats he performed on those songs? The music industry’s approach to digital sampling—the act of incorporating snippets of existing recordings into new ones—holds the answers. Exploring the complexities and contradictions in how samples are licensed, Kembrew McLeod and Peter DiCola interviewed more than 100 musicians, managers, lawyers, industry professionals, journalists, and scholars. Based on those interviews, Creative License puts digital sampling into historical, cultural, and legal context. It describes hip-hop during its sample-heavy golden age in the 1980s and early 1990s, the lawsuits that shaped U.S. copyright law on sampling, and the labyrinthine licensing process that musicians must now navigate. The authors argue that the current system for licensing samples is inefficient and limits creativity. For instance, by estimating the present-day licensing fees for the Beastie Boys’ Paul’s Boutique (1989) and Public Enemy’s Fear of a Black Planet (1990), two albums from hip-hop’s golden age, the authors show that neither album could be released commercially today. Observing that the same dynamics that create problems for remixers now reverberate throughout all culture industries, the authors conclude by examining ideas for reform. Interviewees include David Byrne, Cee Lo Green, George Clinton, De La Soul, DJ Premier, DJ Qbert, Eclectic Method, El-P, Girl Talk, Matmos, Mix Master Mike, Negativland, Public Enemy, RZA, Clyde Stubblefield, T.S. Monk. |
Contents
Introduction | 1 |
1 The Golden Age of Sampling | 19 |
2 A Legal and Cultural History of Sound Collage | 36 |
3 The Competing Interests in Sample Licensing | 75 |
HipHop Goes to Court | 128 |
How It Works and How It Breaks Down | 148 |
An Assessment of the Sample Clearance System | 187 |
7 Proposals for Reform | 217 |
Conclusion | 258 |
Interviewee List | 269 |
Interview Questions | 273 |
Notes | 283 |
| 303 | |
| 313 | |
Other editions - View all
Creative License: The Law and Culture of Digital Sampling Kembrew McLeod,Peter DiCola No preview available - 2011 |
Common terms and phrases
Beastie Boys beat Beatles Black Planet Bridgeport Music chapter Chuck Chuck D Coldcut compulsory license copy copyright holders copyright infringement copyright law copyright owners court created Creative Commons culture Danny Rubin digital sampling Dimension Films economic El-P example explains fair going Grandmaster Flash Grey Album hip-hop artists Ibid interviews Jay-Z LaPolt lawsuit liability rule licensing fees major label Mark Hosler mash-ups melody minimis threshold music industry musical composition copyright musicians who sample Negativland negotiations Paul's Boutique permission play problem producers property rights Public Enemy publishing radio record company record label recording artists release remix replay revenue royalty Run-DMC sample clearance system sample licensing sample-based samplers sampling artists sampling musicians says Shocklee songwriter sound collage sound recording sound recording copyright Steinski studio thing tion track transaction costs U.S. Code Whitney Broussard York