Crime, Punishment, and Mental Illness: Law and the Behavioral Sciences in Conflict
Rutgers University Press, Jul 18, 2008 - Social Science - 238 pages
Hundreds of thousands of the inmates who populate the nation's jails and prison systems today are identified as mentally ill. Many experts point to the deinstitutionalization of mental hospitals in the 1960s, which led to more patients living on their own, as the reason for this high rate of incarceration. But this explanation does not justify why our society has chosen to treat these people with punitive measures.
In Crime, Punishment, and Mental Illness, Patricia E. Erickson and Steven K. Erickson explore how societal beliefs about free will and moral responsibility have shaped current policies and they identify the differences among the goals, ethos, and actions of the legal and health care systems. Drawing on high-profile cases, the authors provide a critical analysis of topics, including legal standards for competency, insanity versus mental illness, sex offenders, psychologically disturbed juveniles, the injury and death rates of mentally ill prisoners due to the inappropriate use of force, the high level of suicide, and the release of mentally ill individuals from jails and prisons who have received little or no treatment.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Systems of Social Control From Asylums to Prisons
Competency to Stand Trial and Competency to Be Executed
The Problems with the Insanity Defense The Conflict Between Law and Psychiatry
The Mad or Bad Debate Concerning Sex Offenders
Juvenile Offenders Developmental Competency and Mental Illness
Other editions - View all
adolescence adults Andrea Yates asylums Baumhammer behavioral sciences Center chapter civil commitment claim competence to stand concerning conﬁned conﬁnement convicted crime criminal act criminal behavior criminal justice system criminal law criminal responsibility decision defendant defendant’s defense counsel deﬁne deﬁnition deinstitutionalization developmental Durham rule federal ﬁnd ﬁnding ﬁrst Grisso guilty Hendricks Human Rights Watch incarceration incompetent individuals inmates insanity defense insanity pleas issue jail jury juvenile justice LIIC M’Naghten rules mens rea ment mental disease mental disorders mental health courts mental hospital mentally ill mentally ill prisoners moral NewYork ofﬁcers ofjustice ofjuvenile ofmental ofthe outpatient commitment Panetti percent person predator problems psychiatric psychiatrists psychological punishment reﬂects reported role schizophrenia sentence seriously mentally ill sex offenders signiﬁcant social construction stand trial state’s statutes suicide Supreme Court testiﬁed tion Torrey Tortorici treatment U.S. Supreme Court YATES youth