Critical Reasoning: GMAT Preparation Guide
Critical Reasoning (1 of the 8 books in Manhattan GMAT's Preparation Guide series) provides a highly organized and structured approach to the variety of questions in this verbal content area. The guide simplifies arguments by illustrating innovative diagramming techniques designed to increase comprehension and improve accuracy, and also details the major and minor critical reasoning question types that appear on the GMAT. The book offers a unique balance between two competing emphases: test-taking strategies and in-depth content understanding. Practice problem sets build specific foundational skills in each topic and include the most advanced content that many other prep books ignore. Book also includes online access to 6 full-length Simulated Practice GMAT Exams at Manhattan GMAT's website.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
ARGUMENT STRUCTURE ll
6 other sections not shown
9l'lan/iattanG 9VlanﬁattanG acupuncture advertising altemative ARGUMENT STRUCTURE assumption average beneﬁts boldface statement BRCA2 breast cancer Canterbury University capuchin monkeys CarStore cause claim companies company’s computers concems consumers correct answer choice Costmart Country Critical Reasoning decrease dental cavities diagram eamed ethanol evidence fact Farmsley Center ﬁber ﬁgure ﬁlm ﬁnancial ﬁnd ﬁrst boldface ﬁsh ﬁve ﬂight fuel gasoline GMAT govemment high school higher Inca Trail increase indicate inﬂuence Intemet Intercontinental Bank investments Irrelevant kidney cancer Knoxworth logical MAT'Prep mayor’s Metropolis Mosquito Coast mutual fund passage pattem percent polyester portions in boldface premises proﬁtability proﬁts question stem question types recent reduce reﬂect result retum revenue scientists second boldface sentence Shadyville signiﬁcant Smithtown Smithtown Theatre speciﬁc standard strategy strengthens the conclusion sunscreen Technocorp television commercials tion town true Tuam Verbal Review warehouse department store weakens the conclusion