Critical thinking: consider the verdict
This introduction to critical thinking teaches individuals how to integrate all their logic skills into the critical decision-making process they undertake in their own lives as citizens and consumers. Organized around lively and authentic examples drawn from jury trials, contemporary political and social debate, and advertising, the book discusses not only how to detect fallacies, but also how to examine, appreciate, and construct cogent arguments. For a lifetime of thinking critically and creating arguments about any and all of life's controversies.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Deductive and Inductive Arguments
Whats the Question?
Relevant and Irrelevant Reasons
19 other sections not shown
affirming the consequent antecedent appeal to authority argu argument by analogy argument form argument is valid asked assumptions Begging the question breaking or entering burden of proof cancer categorical propositions cause certainly charged claim commit conclusion false conditional statement consider cribbage-cheaters crime deductive argument defendant is guilty defendant's defense attorney denying the antecedent disjunction district attorney drugs example Exercise expert eyewitness fact false dilemma Forrest gument guyonovich hermes hominem fallacy innocent invalid irrelevant Jim Larkin judge jurors jury look ment Michael Jordan modus ponens Modus tollens moyer murder necessary and sufficient necessary condition negation nuclear power plants obviously person premises are true premises true Professor Winston prosecution prove reasonable doubt reimel relevant Robert Ransom seals are pessimists shaeffer slippery slope slippery slope fallacy smoking sufficient condition Suppose testify testimony trial truth-value assignment Venn diagram verdict walsh warren