Cruel God, Kind God: How Images of God Shape Belief, Attitude, and Outlook

Front Cover
ABC-CLIO, 2012 - Religion - 185 pages
0 Reviews

This book is born, in large measure, as a result of a writing by contemporary theologian J. Harold Ellens. In his essay "Religious Metaphors Can Kill" from Praeger's "The Destructive Power of Religion," Ellens espouses that theological doctrines are rooted in a model of God that determines all the aspects of those doctrines, and strongly influences the cultures into which it is inserted. Conservative Christianity in the Western world, says Ellens, has at its center the image of a cruel and wrathful God. The juridical atonement theory of Anselm is a result of such an image of God, and has an important role in justifying the resort to violence in human interaction.

Starting from these considerations, "Cruel God, Kind God: How Images of God Shape Belief, Attitude, and Outlook" analyzes three general topics: how two very different kinds of Christianities have emerged from these disparate images of God; how the doctrines of "original sin," "the plan of salvation," and "penal substitution" can be explained by psychological factors, as can the wide dissemination and acceptance of these doctrines; and how the image of a cruel God affects mental health, atrophies personality, and produces guilt and shame.


What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


CHAPTER 1 Introduction
CHAPTER 2 The Many Faces of God
CHAPTER 3 What Characterizes a Conservative Christian?
CHAPTER 4 Doctrines about God and Their Psychological Repercussions
CHAPTER 5 Doctrines of Atonement
CHAPTER 6 Psychological Analysis of the Image of God Implied in the Doctrines of Conservative Christians
CHAPTER 7 Creating a Vengeful God
CHAPTER 8 Consequences
CHAPTER 9 Conclusion

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2012)

Zenon Lotufo Jr., PhD, is a retired Presbyterian minister, a philosopher, and a psychotherapist specializing in Transactional analysis.

Bibliographic information