Cutting Green Tape: Toxic Pollutants, Environmental Regulation, and the Law

Front Cover
Richard L. Stroup, Roger E. Meiners
Transaction Publishers - Law - 333 pages

Hundreds of hazardous waste sites are on the Superfund National Priority List in the United States, and thousands more could become eligible. The Superfund has spent or ordered the spending of billions of dollars, with little apparent impact on human health risks. While public perception of the real or imagined hazardous nature of consumer and industrial substances has resulted in widespread attention to the issue, lawsuits have proliferated with liability aimed at "deep pockets" instead of individual agents who may be responsible. Contributors to Cutting Green Tape carefully examine the existence and severity of the toxic harms and liability problem, the erosion of a clear tort legal system to settle disputes, and whether a clearly defined system of property rights could be developed to reduce the dangers from toxic substances.

Cutting Green Tape rethinks the nature and impact of today's environmental bureaucracy. Rather than continue unworkable, cumbersome, and often contradictory regulations, Cutting Green Tape prescribes a clearer tort legal system to settle disputes and demonstrates that clearly defined environmental property rights would reduce the threat of toxic substances. Among the many topics addressed are: air toxins policy; pollution, damages, and tort law; risk assessment, insurance, and public information; protecting groundwater; regulation of carcinogens; contracting for health and safety; and toxin torts by government.

The book converges on a central theme: when common law remedies, with their burden of proof and standards of evidence, are replaced by the legislatively mandated regulatory regimes described, a problem emerges. The bureaucratic "tunnel vision" described by Justice Stephen Breyer, tends to take over. The police powers of the state are given to bureaucratic decision makers who are limited only by the blunt instrument of political influence, rather than by the need to show harm or wrongdoing in an unbiased court (as the police are), or by a budget on expenditures set by the Congress (as most bureaus are). The excesses described in the chapters thus result not from incompetence in the bureaus, but from the expansive powers granted to decision makers who are tightly focused on the narrow mission they see before them.


What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


Superfund and Risky Risk Reduction
Air Toxics Policy Liabilities from Thin Air
Toxic Torts by Government
Common Law Approaches to Pollution and Toxic Tort Litigation
Rent Seeking on the Legal Frontier
Toxic Torts Problems of Damages and Issues of Liability
Insurance Information and Toxic Risk
Contracting for Health and Safety Risk Perception and Rational Choice
Regulation of Carcinogens Are Animal Tests a Sound Foundation?
Protecting Groundwater and the Unintended Transport of Toxic Substances by Water
Improving the Reliability of Scientific Testimony in Court
About the Editors
About the Contributors

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page v - Arnold S. Trebach American University Gordon Tullock George Mason University Richard E. Wagner George Mason University Sir Alan A. Walters AIG Trading Corporation Carolyn L. Weaver American Enterprise Institute Walter E.
Page v - The resulting studies are widely distributed as books and other publications, and publicly debated through numerous conference and media programs. Through this uncommon independence, depth, and clarity, the Independent Institute pushes at the frontiers of our knowledge, redefines the debate over public issues, and fosters new and effective directions for government reform. FOUNDER & PRESIDENT David J. Theroux RESEARCH DIRECTOR Robert Higgs, Ph.D.
Page v - Given the prevailing influence of partisan interests, little social innovation has occurred. In order to understand both the nature of and possible solutions to major public issues. The Independent Institute's program adheres to the highest standards of independent inquiry and is pursued regardless of prevailing political or social biases and conventions. The resulting studies are widely distributed as books and other publications, and are publicly debated through numerous conference and media programs....
Page v - J. Huston McCulloch Ohio State University Forrest McDonald University of Alabama Thomas Gale Moore Hoover Institution Charles Murray American Enterprise Institute William A. Niskanen Cato Institute Michael J. Novak, Jr. American Enterprise Institute June E.
Page ii - MONEY AND THE NATION STATE The Financial Revolution, Government, and the World Monetary System Edited by Kevin Dowd and Richard H. Timberlake, Jr.

Bibliographic information