D.C. Justice Reform Act of 1992; Efforts in the D.C. Omnibus Anticrime Act of 1992; and Remove Gender Specific References from D.C. Code: Hearing and Markup Before the Subcommittee on Judiciary and Education and the Committee on the District of Columbia, House of Representatives, One Hundred Second Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 4096, H.R. 4396, H.R. 2694, and Clean Bills, June 25, July 22, and August 11, 1992 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
additional adults amended by striking appropriate assault authority Bail Reform Amendment Bliley Chair Chairman chief judge citizens commissioner judicial magistrate committed Committee CONGRESS THE LIBRARY convicted Corporation Counsel crime of violence D.C. City Council D.C. Code D.C. Council death penalty defendant degree murder Dellums detain District of Columbia drug DYMALLY ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON enacted Federal felony firearm hearing commissioner judicial home rule homicide Howard University immigration imprisonment increase initiative inserting the judge issue judicial officer judicial resources jurisdiction jury juvenile Latino law enforcement legislation LIBRARY OF CONGRESS LULAC Mayor KELLY NALEO nation's capital National NORTON offense Omnibus Anti-Crime Act parole Payton person place it appears police problem proposed prosecution Reform Act Reform Amendment Act release sentence Sharon Pratt Kelly small claims court statement status subsection Superior Court testimony Thank trial U.S. attorney United victims of violent Vietnamese Vietnamese Americans violent crime youth
Popular passages
Page 59 - Except as otherwise expressly provided, whenever in this Act an amendment or repeal is expressed in terms of an amendment to, or repeal of, a section or other provision, the reference shall be considered to be made to a section or other provision of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.
Page 257 - If from the evidence it appears to the commissioner that there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed and that the defendant has committed it, the commissioner shall forthwith hold him to answer in the district court; otherwise the commissioner shall discharge him.
Page 256 - Columbia government ; (3) is a bona fide resident of the District of Columbia and has maintained an actual place of abode in the District for at least ninety days immediately prior to his...
Page 256 - Judicial Magistrates. (a) with the approval of a majority of the judges of the Superior Court of the district of Columbia in active service and subject to standards and procedures established by the rules of the Superior Court, the chief judge of the Superior Court may appoint hearing...
Page 303 - The amendments made by this section shall apply only with respect to distributions made after the date of the enactment of this Act. Amend the title so as to read : A bill to amend the...
Page 348 - I will offer the amendments, and will ask unanimous consent that the bill be considered as read and open for amendments at any place and printed in the record.
Page 260 - ... it shall not be necessary at the initial appearance for the Corporation Counsel to establish probably cause to believe that the allegations in the petition are true.
Page 142 - Section 3142(e) provides that "[i]f, after a hearing pursuant to the provisions of subsection (f), the judicial officer finds that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of any other person and the community, he shall order the detention of the person prior to trial.
Page 126 - ... in or on, or within one thousand feet of, the real property comprising a public or private elementary, vocational, or secondary school or a public or private college, junior college, or university, or a playground, or within 100 feet of a public or private youth center, public swimming pool, or video arcade...
Page 257 - Full-time United States magistrates may not engage in the practice of law, and may not engage in any other business, occupation, or employment inconsistent with the expeditious, proper, and impartial performance of their duties as judicial officers.