Defamation Trials and Damage Awards - Updating the Franklin Studies : LRDC Study No. 1. Summary Judgment in Libel Litigation, Assessing the Impact of Hutchinson V. Proxmire : LRDC Study, Issue 2
Libel Defense Resource Center, 1982 - Libel and slander - 52 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
120n.9 STANDARD DISCOVERY 6Med 7Med 8Med Actual malice Cited Affirmed grant BASIS FOR DISPOSITIVE cial cited Neutral Sufficient cited Not clear common law convincing clarity date PREVAILING NAME defamation actions DEFENDANT'S PROXMIRE DENIAL ISSUE/DEFENSE 1979 Denied Genuine directed verdict DISPOSITIVE lll Dist EMPLOYED OTHER MATTERS FACT date PREVAILING filed FRANKLIN DATA Franklin study Genuine Actual malice Hutchinson footnote 9 JUDGMENT CASE LIST JUDGMENT DENIAL ISSUE/DEFENSE JUDGMENT SUMMARY BASIS Jury Plaintiff L.Rptr LDRC Bulletin LDRC data LDRC sample LDRC study LIST HUTCHINSON RULING LIST TRIER malice Not cited media defendant media libel molion motions for summary Neutral Sufficient discovery Opinion Not cited PARTY and citation Penthouse POST-TRIAL RULINGS Public figure Public offi punitive damages Reduced by trial RESULT OF APPEAL RESULTS OF SUMMARY Rptr success rates summary judgment motions SUMMARY MOTION TRIAL AND DAMAGES trial court TRIAL DAMAGES AWARDED trial judge TRIER OF FACT verdict PARTY