Defending American Religious Neutrality
While First Amendment doctrine treats religion as a human good, the state must not take sides on theological questions. Koppelman explains the logic of this uniquely American form of neutrality: why it is fair to give religion special treatment, why old (but not new) religious ceremonies are permitted, and why laws must have a secular purpose.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accommodation Aguillard Amendment American law Andrew Koppelman andState andthe argues atheists Backus basis bythe Catholic ceremonial Deism Christian Church claims conception conscience Constitution corruption argument decisions declare Diarmaid MacCulloch disestablishment dissenting Dworkin Eisgruber and Sager endorsement epistemic equal Establishment Clause Eugene Volokh Free Exercise fromthe God’s human Id.at interpretation inthe invalidated Isaac Backus isan isnot itis Jed Rubenfeld Jefferson John Leland John Rawls Justice Kent Greenawalt L.Rev legislative Leland Liberal Macklem Madison Martha Nussbaum McConnell meaning Memorial and Remonstrance Michael W modern moral nonreligious O’Connor objection ofreligion ofreligious ofthe onthe originalist plurality political prayer principles prong protection Protestantism question Rawls regime religion clauses religious beliefs religious exemptions Religious Freedom religious liberty religious neutrality religious truth RFRA Scalia schools secular purpose requirement Smith specific state’s statute Steven Supreme Court thatis thatthe theCourt theological thestate Thomas tobe tothe views violated Williams withthe