Defending Diversity: Affirmative Action at the University of Michigan
University of Michigan Press, 2004 - Education - 218 pages
Even as lawsuits challenging its admissions policies made their way through the courts, the University of Michigan carried the torch for affirmative action in higher education.
In June 2003, the Supreme Court vindicated UM's position on affirmative action when it ruled that race may be used as a factor for universities in their admissions programs, thus confirming what the UM had argued all along: diversity in the classroom translates to a beneficial and wide-ranging social value. With the green light given to the law school's admissions policies, Defending Diversity validates the positive benefits gained by students in a diverse educational setting.
Written by prominent University of Michigan faculty, Defending Diversity is a timely response to the court's ruling. Providing factual background, historical setting, and the psychosocial implications of affirmative action, the book illuminates the many benefits of a diverse higher educational setting -- including preparing students to be full participants in a pluralistic democracy -- and demonstrates why affirmative action is necessary to achieve that diversity.
Defending Diversity is a significant contribution to the ongoing discussion on affirmative action in higher education. Perhaps more important, it is a valuable record of the history, events, arguments, and issues surrounding the original lawsuits and the Supreme Court's subsequent ruling, and helps reclaim the debate from those forces opposed to affirmative action.
Patricia Gurin is Professor Emerita, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan. Jeffrey S. Lehman, former Dean of the University of Michigan Law School, is President of Cornell University. Earl Lewis is Dean of Rackham Graduate School, University of Michigan.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Why History Remains a Factor in
The Evolving Language of Diversity
4 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
academic admissions policy admissions process affirmative action African American students Amici Curiae amicus briefs Asian American backgrounds Bollinger campus challenge Civil Rights colleges and universities color blindness colorblindness compelling interest critical cultural democracy outcomes democratic dents desegregated discrimination discussion diverse peers diverse student body diversity experience educational benefits EDUCATIONAL VALUE EFENDING DIVERSITY effects ence environment equal ethnic diversity EVOLVING LANGUAGE experience with diversity faculty foster graduate Gratz Grutter Gurin higher education HISTORY REMAINS important individuals institutions integration interaction interracial Justice Powell's LANGUAGE OF DIVERSITY Latino law school learning majority Mary Sue Coleman NAACP Nagda Nancy Cantor opportunity percent perspectives positive race race and ethnicity race-blind racial and ethnic racial integration racial/ethnic groups racially diverse REMAINS A FACTOR segregation sity society stereotypes strict scrutiny students of color Supreme Court tion tive undergraduate University of Michigan university's VALUE OF DIVERSITY white students