Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates

Front Cover
Stanford University Press, 1992 - Social Science - 224 pages
0 Reviews
In the past decade the central principles of western feminist theory have been dramatically challenged. many feminists have endorsed post-structuralism's rejection of essentialist theoretical categories, and have added a powerful gender dimension to contemporary critiques of modernity. Earlier 'women' have been radically undermined, and newer concerns with 'difference', 'identity', and 'power' have emerged. Destabilizing Theory explores these developments in a set of specially commissioned essays by feminist theorists. Does this change amount to a real shift within feminist theory, or will feminism's links with an emancipatory modernism reinstate an older political agenda? Can we transcend the common counterposition of equality and difference, or is feminism condemned to argue within the terms of this binary opposition?

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


Universal Pretensions in Political Thought
PostPostModernism? Theorizing Social Complexity
Womens Interests and the PostStructuralist State
Locating the Politics of Experience
Sexual Practice and Changing Lesbian Identities
Power Bodies and Difference
Painting Feminism History
The Politics of Translation
Materialism and Method

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

All Book Search results »

About the author (1992)

Michele Barrett is Professor of Sociology at the City University, London. Her many books include "The Politics of Truth, Women's Oppression Today", and "Destabilizing Theory with Anne Phillips

Anne Phillips is Professor of Politics at London Guildhall University. Her publications include The Politics of Presence (1995), Democracy and Difference (1993), Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates (co-edited with Michele Barrett, 1992), and Engendering Democracy (1991).

Bibliographic information