What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Theories of contrast
Determinants of disagreement
22 other sections not shown
analysis of variance anchor appear appropriate target descriptions arithmetic mean bold cautious cautious-bold test Column compared to R^q context contrast effect correlation curve describe a target describe Jim describe the target descriptions of targets disagreement predictions Empirical model estimated experiment experimental conditions explicit reference point expressions to describe Fanshawe College Figure 9b geometric mean groups Hakel's Helson hypothesis increase intersubject disagreement lower reference point magnification weight mean descriptions mean target description midpoint Miss Sweden Motivated conditions Motivated to Stress numerical frequencies observed disagreement original reference point original stimulus scale original subscale original target pair of reference Parducci personality test predict disagreement Prytulak quantitative expressions range of appropriate reference-point response alternatives response list response scale selected single-reference single-reference-point descriptions Stress R^q student subtracted target and reference target-reference point discrepancy targets compared Theoretical model traits transformed reference point transformed stimulus scale transformed target frequencies Upshaw weighted geometric mean