Dialogic Education: Conversation about Ideas and Between Persons
Examining undergraduate education from the point of view of a philosopher of communication, Ronald C. Arnett takes a positive view of higher education during a time when education is being assailed as seldom before. Arnett responds to this criticism with convincing support of the academy reinforced by his personal experiences as well as those of others scholars and teachers. Arnett's book is an invitation to converse about higher education as well as a reminder of the potential for dialogue between teacher and student, dialogue that the author defines as a "willingness to enter conversation about ideas," to maintain relationships through differences, and to ask value questions. Arnett see education as more than the dispensing of information. He emphasizes the importance of character development as well as the the development of relationships between students and teachers. Arnett stresses the importance of honesty and integrity in students, teachers, and administrators, and he insists that education should focus more on the good of the entire school than on the individual. Arnett does not offer this book as the truth about education nor as a "how to teach" manual. Rather, he regards it as an attempt to understand education from a communication perspective and as a reminder of the positive and constructive aspects of teaching. The book is based on Arnett's belief that educators who care about ideas and people not only improve education but also benefit the community.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
academic home action administration American Aristotle asked Athenian Bellah breadth campus or department career caring Carl Rogers Christopher Lasch civility classroom colleagues college or university commitment common center concern conversation about ideas culture cynicism decision democracy democratic dialogic education dialogic teaching Dietrich Bonhoeffer difference disappointment discipline discussion educa educational home environment faculty member feel friendship future higher education hope human ideological importance individual inquiry institution intellectual interaction interested in dialogic interpersonal invite involves Jacques Ellul knowledge leaders leadership lifelong learning lives logic education Martin Buber ment Neil Postman Nicomachean Ethics notion offer one's participation participatory decision person perspective philosophical political position possible professional professor questions relational relationships reminds requires Robert Bellah role scholarly sense significant Sissela Bok style suggests task teacher teaching and scholarship teleology tion tradition undergraduate understanding virtue vision vocation willingness York