Disapproval of action of the President under section 203 of the Trade Act of 1974: adverse report together with dissenting views to accompany H.J. Res. 84) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office).
U.S. G.P.O., 2002 - Technology & Engineering - 10 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
$80 million 1974 transmitted action taken Administration’s action American consumers cerning compliance with clause Congress on March Congressional Budget Office December 19 disapprove the action enact Erin Whitaker established in UMRA evenly divided determination ﬁnal decision ﬁnding ﬁrst three ﬁscal year 2006 George Will described H.J. Res higher tariffs House Joint Resolution House of Representatives importers of steel importers would total ITC transmitted ITC was evenly ITC’s remedy Joint Resolution 84 mandate on importers mandates as deﬁned March 20 million in 2002 million in ﬁscal ommendations pay-as-you-go procedures pose a private-sector President under section President’s action President’s decision President’s rem President’s remedy private-sector mandate product categories regarding steel imports remedy recommendations respect to clause revenues by $93 Rules section 203 stainless steel steel tariffs subject to higher tariff increases TAX EXPENDITURES taxes on American tool steel Trade Act trading partners tribal governments U.S. imports U.S. industry UMRA $115 million voice vote