Distorting the Law: Politics, Media, and the Litigation Crisis
University of Chicago Press, Nov 15, 2009 - Political Science - 332 pages
In recent years, stories of reckless lawyers and greedy citizens have given the legal system, and victims in general, a bad name. Many Americans have come to believe that we live in the land of the litigious, where frivolous lawsuits and absurdly high settlements reign.
Scholars have argued for years that this common view of the depraved ruin of our civil legal system is a myth, but their research and statistics rarely make the news. William Haltom and Michael McCann here persuasively show how popularized distorted understandings of tort litigation (or tort tales) have been perpetuated by the mass media and reform proponents. Distorting the Law lays bare how media coverage has sensationalized lawsuits and sympathetically portrayed corporate interests, supporting big business and reinforcing negative stereotypes of law practices.
Based on extensive interviews, nearly two decades of newspaper coverage, and in-depth studies of the McDonald's coffee case and tobacco litigation, Distorting the Law offers a compelling analysis of the presumed litigation crisis, the campaign for tort law reform, and the crucial role the media play in this process.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contesting Legal Realities
Tales of Legal Degeneration and Moral Regeneration
Narratives versus Numbers
Plaintiffs Lawyers Play Defense
Reporting Legal Realities
Media Coverage of Civil Litigation
Other editions - View all
advocates agenda American anecdotes arguments asbestos ATLA ATRA attention attorneys blame campaign challenge chapter cited citizens civil justice system civil litigation claims common sense complaints complex consumers contest corporate costs courts coverage critics defendants discourse disputes dramatic Eisenberg elites evidence example fact filings focus Galanter groups harm hot coffee individual responsibility institutional instrumental issues John Stossel journalists judges jurors lawsuit crisis legal knowledge legal lore legal system legislation logic Manhattan Institute mass media McDonald’s coffee medical malpractice million moral Moreover narratives neoliberal newspapers norms percent personal injury personal injury lawyers plaintiffs political polls pop reform pop tort reform practices products liability punitive damages Ralph Nader readers reports routinely Saks scholars settlement smoking social society specific spilled Stella Liebeck stories strategy tend theme tion tive tobacco companies tobacco litigation tort law tort tale tort tales trial lawyers verdict victims Walter Olson