Distributional Effects of Environmental and Energy Policy: An Introduction
This chapter reviews literature on the distributional effects of environmental and energy policy. In particular, many effects of such policy are likely regressive. First, it raises the price of fossil-fuel-intensive products, expenditures on which are a high fraction of low-income budgets. Second, if abatement technologies are capital-intensive, then any mandate to abate pollution may induce firms to use more capital. If demand for capital is raised relative to labor, then a lower relative wage may also hurt low-income households. Third, pollution permits handed out to firms bestow scarcity rents on well-off individuals who own those firms. Fourth, low-income individuals may place more value on food and shelter than on incremental improvements in environmental quality. If high-income individuals get the most benefit of pollution abatement, then this effect is regressive as well. Fifth, low-income renters miss out on house price capitalization of air quality benefits. Well-off landlords may reap those gains. Sixth, transition effects could well hurt the unemployed who are already at some disadvantage. These six effects might all hurt the poor more than the rich. This paper discusses whether these fears are valid, and whether anything can be done about them.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
abate pollution abatement technologies air quality annual income area A+B auction of permits Baumol and Oates burden calculate capitalization effects carbon tax cars Chapter Clean Air Act cleaner air consumer surplus consumption Dinan economic efficiency Economics and Management effects of environmental elasticities electricity emission rate endogenous environmental and energy Environmental Economics environmental policy environmental protection environmental quality Environmental Taxes estimated factor Fullerton gains and losses gas tax Heutel high fraction high income house prices human capital impact income tax input-output model Instrumental Variables Journal of Environmental labor land prices less regressive lifetime income literature location decisions look low-income households marginal costs Metcalf National Tax Journal NBER neighborhood characteristics offset output prices paper polluter location pollution per unit pollution tax poor countries Poterba price response production profits quota raise reduce restriction revenue risk sector stockholders subscriptions Superfund tax incidence variables vehicle volume willingness to pay