Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization
Westview Press, 2003 - Political Science - 190 pages
Party polarization in the House of Representatives has increased in recent decades. Explaining this development has been difficult, given current interpretations of American elections. The dominant framework for interpreting elections has been to see them as candidate-centered, or individualistic. This framework may have seemed appropriate as a way to see elections during the 1970s and 1980s, when identification with parties declined and split-ticket voting increased. With increasing party differences, however, the presumptions that campaigns focus on candidates separate from parties, and that voters are less partisan in their voting, do not provide a satisfactory framework for understanding our current situation. This proposed book explains the emergence of party polarization by focusing on how the constituencies of House districts affect partisan outcomes and the subsequent voting behavior of House members. This proposed analysis is premised on the simple argument that members are elected from districts, and an explanation of polarization must begin with districts. The origins of polarization lie in the realignment of the electoral bases of the parties, and the shifting demographic composition of America. Liberal voting is more likely among members from urban, lower-income, largely non-white districts. Conservative voting is more likely among members from higher-income, largely white districts. Realignment has resulted in Democrats representing urban, lower-income, heavily non-white districts, while Republicans are more likely to come from suburban-rural, more affluent, white districts. Perhaps most important, the percentage of districts with a substantial proportion of non-whites is steadily increasing in the United States. The analysis will focus primarily on changes since the 1960s.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Limits of
Congressional District Data
Figure Map and Table Credits
Other editions - View all
20 percent Al Smith alignment American politics Average ADA Ratings average ADA score blacks campaign candidate-centered politics Census civil rights compiled by authors Congressional Quarterly conservative constituencies created Data compiled decade declined Democratic Party Democrats and Republicans distribution diversity divisions effect election outcomes electoral bases Figure groups Hispanics House candidates House districts House elections ideological immigration increased incumbents indicates issues Latinos legislation less affluent levels liberal voting records liberal-conservative median family income North Northern occurred partisan outcomes Party Differences party members party polarization party voting party's percent non-white percent of districts percentage of non-whites population presence of non-whites presents presidential and House primarily white reapportionment region relatively Republican Party Rohde role shift significant social change South split-ticket voting Stonecash trends tricts Turner and Schneier U.S. House U.S. House elections uncontested races urban areas urban districts Volstead Act voters Voting Rights Act winners won by Democrats
Page 42 - Johnson signs the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The most sweeping civil rights legislation since Reconstruction, the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination of all kinds based on race, color, religion, or national origin.
Journal of Political Science, Volume 32
Snippet view - 2004
All Book Search results »
Elections in the Americas A Data Handbook Volume 1: North America, Central ...
No preview available - 2005