Economic Advice and Rhetoric: Why Do Consultants Perform Better Than Academic Advisers?
This book compares the approaches of consultants and academic advisers and provides an in-depth analysis of their advice argumentation. Both compete on the market for economic advice, with consultants enjoying a larger market share and usually obtaining h
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
2 Consultants and academics views on advice
3 Advice analysis and rhetoric
4 Espoused theory of advice argumentation
5 Advice on further growth of Amsterdam Airport
6 Advice on liberalization in the electricity market
Other editions - View all
academic advisers academic ethos academic reports advice practices advisers and consultants aesthetic alternatives Amsterdam Airport debate apply approach argues Argyris Aristotle assignments backing Capgemini causal Chapter character characterize claims client common sense conclusions consider consultant reports consultants and academic consultants present context of advice contract research controversial cost-benefit analysis criteria critical critical theory develop dialectic discuss economic advice economists effects of Amsterdam electricity market epistemology estimates evaluative experience explicit give advice grounds growth of Amsterdam Habermas implies interests Klamer knowledge KPMG Kubr liberalization debate Majone means ments methodological methods motivational arguments motivational warrants negative effects neutral nomic non-controversial normative economic Nyfer objectives perspective positive economic positive effects positivist postmodernist questions Rasiel and Friga recommendations refer relevant Robbins Schön scientific scientists social sources Table theoretical tion tive Toulmin traditional academic valuations values Weggeman welfare effects