What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
INTRODUCTION TO PURE ECONOMIC
Strengths and Weaknesses of a Single General
Aluma Kraft Mfg Co v Elmer Fox Co 1973 493 S
19 other sections not shown
accident accident-caused damage amount analysis apply approach argued argument assumed assumption of responsibility basis beneficiary benefit cargo owner cause of action Chapter claim clause collateral source common law Commonwealth considered contract contractor Corp cost court decision defective defendant defendant's disclaimer discussed economic loss consequent employer Evatt example exclusionary rule favour Glanzer Hedley Byrne held liable House of Lords Ibid information or advice infra issue justify limited Lord Denning manufacturer negligence law negligent misrepresentation obligation pecuniary interest personal injury physical damage physical harm potentially indeterminate privity problem products liability property damage pure economic loss reasonable reliance recognize a duty recover relationship relevant relied representation Restatement Rptr seems ship Smillie statutory strict liability strict tort subrogation suffered Supp supra theory third party third party beneficiary tion tortfeasor transaction Ultramares victim voluntary assumption warranty