Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weaknesses
This book is the first to provide an in-depth analysis of the peer review process in scholarly publishing. Author Weller offers a systematic review of published studies of editorial peer review in the following broad categories: general studies of rejection rates, studies of editors, studies of authors, and studies of reviewers. The book concludes with an examination of new models of editorial peer review intended to enhance the scientific communication process as it moves from a print to an electronic environment.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accepted American Journal American Psychological Association American Psychologist Archives asked authorship behavior biomedical blind review British Medical Journal Canadian Medical Association citations coauthored colleagues discipline discussed double-blind economics editorial board members editorial peer review editorial policies England Journal evaluation examined Fletcher group of journals Hargens identified impact factor included indexed Internal Medicine investigators JAMA jour Journal of Medicine Journal of Public journal titles July Laband Library Lindsey literature manuscript review March March 9 Medical Association Journal Medical Journal Editors nals Nursing Outlook papers peer review process percent percentage Psychology Public Health publication bias published articles reasons for rejection recommendations referees rejected manuscripts rejection rates Relman reports reviewer agreement studies reviewer bias reviewer guidelines scholarly science journals scientific scripts Social sociology statistical analysis statistical review statistical tests statistically significant suggested Surgery survey Table thanks to reviewers tion Weller Yankauer Zuckerman & Merton