Electoral Realignments: A Critique of an American GenreThe study of electoral realignments is one of the most influential and intellectually stimulating enterprises undertaken by American political scientists. Realignment theory has been seen as a science able to predict changes, and generations of students, journalists, pundits, and political scientists have been trained to be on the lookout for "signs" of new electoral realignments. Now a major political scientist argues that the essential claims of realignment theory are wrong--that American elections, parties, and policymaking are not (and never were) reconfigured according to the realignment calendar. David Mayhew examines fifteen key empirical claims of realignment theory in detail and shows us why each in turn does not hold up under scrutiny. It is time, he insists, to open the field to new ideas. We might, for example, adopt a more nominalistic, skeptical way of thinking about American elections that highlights contingency, short-term election strategies, and valence issues. Or we might examine such broad topics as bellicosity in early American history, or racial questions in much of our electoral history. But we must move on from an old orthodoxy and failed model of illumination. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
alignments alleged American Electoral American history American Political analysis appear associated Bartels brought Bryan campaign candidates cause century claims close Clubb Consider convention Court Critical Elections David Deal Democratic depression Development distinct Dynamics early economic effect elec electoral realignment eras evidence example federal Flanigan followed Free Soil parties House idea ideological important innovations issues John Journal junctures kind late least major McKinley measure ments midterm nominating once Partisan Realignment Party Systems patterns Paul Allen percent periodicity Political Science president Princeton probably Process Progressive question realignments genre relevant Republican result Richard Roosevelt Schattschneider seems Senate Social South southern spans statistical story Sundquist surge System of 1896 Theory third parties tion turnout United University Press values vote voter Walter Dean Burnham World yes yes York Zingale
Bibliographic information
| Title | Electoral Realignments: A Critique of an American Genre The Institution for Social and Policy Studies Yale ISPS series |
| Author | David R. Mayhew |
| Edition | unabridged |
| Publisher | Yale University Press, 2002 |
| ISBN | 0300093659, 9780300093650 |
| Length | 174 pages |
| Subjects | › › Political Science / Political Process / Campaigns & Elections |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |