Energy and water development appropriations for fiscal year 1985: hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, Ninety-eighth Congress, second session, Parts 1-2
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accelerator action activities additional Administration agencies amount Answer applications appropriation approval areas assistance authority Basin bill budget request Chairman HATFIELD Commission Committee completed Congress construction continue contract Corps cost Department determine directed economic effective efforts energy engineering environmental equipment estimate evaluation existing expected facilities Federal fiscal fiscal year 1985 flood follows fuel funds future going Government improve increase industry initiated interest issues Laboratory Lake licensing major materials million nuclear obligations Office operation percent Physics planning plant potential prepared present problems production proposed Question reactor record reduce response result River safety schedule Secretary Senator sharing specific staff statement storage studies supply technical testing United University utilities waste
Page 1011 - I am directing a comprehensive and intensive effort to define a long-term research and development program to begin to achieve our ultimate goal of eliminating the threat posed by strategic nuclear missiles.
Page 1123 - US for maintaining peace, have agreed that a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought.
Page 855 - ... there is a genuine and substantial dispute of fact which can only be resolved with sufficient accuracy by the introduction of evidence in an adjudicatory hearing; and (B) the decision of the Commission is likely to depend in whole or in part on the resolution of such dispute.
Page 1158 - Programs for the express purpose of providing a research and development facility to demonstrate the safe disposal of radioactive wastes resulting from the defense activities and programs of the United States exempted from regulation by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Page 442 - The national facilities are: the Clinton P. Anderson Meson Physics Facility (LAMPF) at Los Alamos National Laboratory...
Page 933 - Yet, nevertheless, this significant numerical superiority of defenders was insufficient to force the attackers to fully curtail their active operation. Therefore the question of the ratio of submarines to anti-submarine...
Page 343 - Potomac drainage area and the US Congress approved it on July 11, 1940. The signatory bodies later ratified amendments to the Compact to broaden the Commission's coordination, investigation, and education responsibilities to include “development, utilization and conservation of the water and associated land resources
Page 770 - Agency would be headed by a Director appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
Page 99 - The only cumulative record the corps keeps of total benefits and cost allocations to a project purpose is flood control. Remaining costs are not segregated by project purpose. However, the following tabulation does provide quantitative benefits provided by completed projects in our investment program. Flood control (billions): Flood damages prevented through fiscal...