What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
affidavit aforesaid agreement alleged amount answer appeared appellant application appointed assignment Attorney-General Beav bill Bishopdale cause circumstances claim clause codicil commissioners contended contract costs Court court of equity covenant creditors damages daughter death debt deceased declaration decree deed defendant defendant's East Looe entitled evidence execution executors fact favour filed Forsbrook Frank Clarke fund George Ormerod given granted ground injunction interest intestate issue Joseph Brook judgment jury land lease liable Lordships marriage mortgage motion Nancy Mills notice opinion paid paid into court parties partnership payment personal estate petition petitioner plaintiff plea possession premises present proceedings profits purchase purchase-money purpose question Railway Company referred refused rent respect respondent Romilly rule settlement shareholders shares ship Sir John solicitor suit tenant testator testator's testatrix thereof trustees vessel Vice-Chancellor Vict Western Railway wife William winding-up
Page 3061 - by any deed or deeds, instrument or instruments, in writing, to be sealed and delivered by her in the presence of and attested by two or more credible witnesses, or by her last will and testament in writing, or any writing in the nature of or purporting to be her last will and testament, or any codicil or codicils thereto, to be
Page 3307 - defendant, obtained a rule to set aside the verdict, and for a new trial on the ground—first, that the verdict was against evidence; and secondly, on the ground of misdirection in this, that the learned judge ought to have told the jury that the goods supplied to the
Page 2732 - entirely by the negligence or improper conduct of the defendant, or whether the plaintiff himself so far contributed to the misfortune, by his own negligence or want of ordinary and common care and caution, that, but for such negligence or want of ordinary care and caution on his part, the misfortune would not have happened
Page 3234 - Where by the above rule one of two ships is to keep out of the way, the other shall keep her course, subject to the qualifications contained in the following article,
Page 3388 - And be it enacted that no party shall at any time be required to sell or convey to the promoters of the undertaking, a part only of any house or other building or manufactory, if such party be willing and able to sell and convey the whole thereof.'
Page 3064 - close-hauled, and the other ship free, in which case the latter ship shall keep out of the way; but if they have the wind on the same side, or if one of them has the wind aft, the ship which is to windward shall keep out of the way of the ship which is to leeward. I
Page 3265 - If two ships under steam are crossing so as to involve risk of collision, the ship which has the other on her own starboard side shall keep out of the
Page 3235 - to be applicable to this case: "If two ships, one of which is a sailing ship, and the other a steamship, are proceeding in such directions as to involve risk of collision, the steamship shall keep out of the way of the sailing ship.