Equality with a Vengeance: Men's Rights Groups, Battered Women, and Antifeminist Backlash
This book investigates efforts by fathers' rights groups to undermine battered women's shelters and services, in the context of the backlash against feminism. Dragiewicz examines the lawsuit Booth v. Hvass, in which fathers' rights groups attempted to use an Equal Protection claim to argue that funding emergency services that target battered women is discriminatory against men. As Dragiewicz shows, this case (which was eventually dismissed) is relevant to widespread efforts to promote a degendered understanding of violence against women in order to eradicate policies and programs that were designed to ameliorate harm to battered women.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Equality with a Vengeance: Men's Rights Groups, Battered Women, and ...
Limited preview - 2011
accounts acts antifeminist argued assault attacks attention battered women behavior Booth plaintiffs changes cited claims context contributing court crime cultural DeKeseredy deny described differences discourses Dobash documented domestic violence Dragiewicz efforts example existing experiences explain factors fathers female feminism feminist forms funding gender going groups Hearn homicide husbands Hvass identified important indicates individual injury intimate partners issue Journal Justice killed lence major male masculinity mean men’s violence minimize Minnesota multiple narratives nature never norms noted observed patriarchy percent perpetrated person physical police political rates refers relationships representative responses reveal sample scholars Schwartz sex differences sexual shelters similar situated social problem Straus term tion understanding United victims violence against intimates violence against women violence and abuse wife wives woman abuse