Erotic Liberalism: Women and Revolution in Montesquieu's Persian LettersA treatment of Montesquieu's Persian Letters, which argues that the novel is a philosophic critique of despotism in all its forms: domestic, political and religious. It shows that Montesquieu believed that the Enlightenment failed as a philosophy by not recognising man as an erotic being. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Erotic Liberalism: Women and Revolution in Montesquieu's Persian Letters Diana J. Schaub No preview available - 1995 |
Common terms and phrases
According ancient appear attempt authority become begins believe chapter character Christian claims commerce concerned constitute course criticism describes desire despotism discussion domestic effect empire equality establishment eunuchs fact fear female final finds follow France French give given harem Hobbes honor human husband individual instance interest Italy king Laws Lettres persanes liberal liberty linked live Machiavelli male manners marriage means modesty monarchy Montes Montesquieu moral nature novel original Paris passions perhaps Persian Letters philosopher pleasure political possible present Press question reader reason regarded regimes relation religion religious republic Rica Rica's Roman Roxane rule says seems sense sexual shows social society soul speaks Spirit story Studies suggests things thought tion Troglodytes turn understanding University Usbek vanity virtue wife wives woman women writes written Zachi Zélis