Essaying Montaigne: a study of the Renaissance institution of writing and reading
John O'Neill reads Montaigne's Essays from their central principle of friendship as a communicative and pedagogical practice operative in society, literature and politics. The friendship between Montaigne and La Boétie was ruled neither by plenitude nor lack but by a capacity for recognition and transitivity. As an essayist Montaigne is an exemplary practitioner of a technique of difference and recognition that puts all certainties of history, philosophy and culture in the balance of weighted comparison. The essayist reveals how every absolute subjectivity or authority is shaken by its internal weakness once we move inside the contrastive structure of domination in politics, gender and race. O'Neill's reading of the Essays strives to be faithful to the phenomenology of their embodied practices of reading-to-write-to re-read and re-write. From this standpoint he engages the principal critical readings of the Essays over the last century that have examined with great brilliance their history, structure and psychology. Whether the structure is evolutionary, structuralist, Marxist or psychoanalytical, O'Neill provides close readings of Montaigne's literary critics. By bringing to bear the ethico-critical practice of 'essaying' to resist the subjection of the Essays to dominant criticism, O'Neill reminds readers that Montaigne's appeal is in how he survived bloody cultural war with a balance of modesty and tolerance, invoking compromise where others practice violence.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Preface to the revised edition
the Problem of Literary Authority
Literary Anxiety and the Romance of Books
11 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Essaying Montaigne: A Study of the Renaissance Institution of Writing and ...
No preview available - 2001
achieve Anthony Wilden argue argument artist baroque Bildungsroman bodily body Boétie Boétie’s Butor Chap civilised classical consider consubstantiality course critical culture death deﬁnite difference difﬁcult discourse embodied essay Of Coaches essayist Essays Montaigne essential Etiemble experience ﬁction ﬁeld ﬁgure ﬁnd ﬁnding ﬁrst ﬂowers friendship hetaireia human humanist inﬂuence interpretation John O’Neill knowledge language life’s literary literature living Machiavelli man’s Maurice Merleau-Ponty means metaphors Michel de Montaigne mind Montaigne Montaigne’s Essays moral Moreover nature never one’s ourselves paradox Paris passions Petrarch Phenomenology philosophical Plato pleasure plenitude Plutarch political portrait practice preface problem question Raymond Sebond reader reading and writing reason reﬂection Regosin Rembrandt Renaissance requires self-essaying self-inquiry self-portrait sense social society Socrates soul speak speech Stoicism Studies taigne taigne’s theory thereby things thought tion tradition trans truth University Press virtue Wilden words York