Despite western Europe’s traditional disdain for the United States’ “adversarial legalism,” the European Union is shifting toward a similar approach to the law, according to Daniel Kelemen. Coining the term “eurolegalism” to describe the hybrid, he shows how the political and organizational realities of the EU make this shift inevitable.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
access to justice administrative adopted adversarial legalism American antidiscrimination antitrust approach cartels class actions Commission’s competition authorities competition law competition policy competition regime consumer contingency fees developments disability discrimination disability policy disability rights disability rights movement disabled persons disclosure Dutch economic encourage Equal Treatment Equality Directive established EU competition law EU law EU’s Euro Eurolegalism Europe European Commission European integration European Parliament European Union Financial Services France Germany groups impact implementation insider trading institutions investors judicial Kelemen law firms Law Review lawyers legal aid legal services legislation litigation medical/welfare model ment merger model of disability modes of governance national competition national courts national level ordoliberal Oxford pean policy areas policy makers political private enforcement procedural programs quota reforms regulatory regime regulatory style rely requirements rights-based role rules securities markets securities regulation shareholder single market spread of adversarial tion tional traditional transparency Treaty Wigger