Evaluation and auditing: prospects for convergence
Jossey-Bass Pub., Nov 7, 1996 - Business & Economics - 71 pages
Both evaluation and auditing claim to help decision makers by providing them with systematic and credible information that can be useful in the creation, management, oversight, change, and occasionally abolishment of programs. Yet despite considerable overlap in objectives, subject matter, and clients, auditing and evaluation have until recently functioned largely in isolation from on another. The literature of each discipline scarcely recognized the existence of the other; academic preparation of auditors and evaluators could hardly be more different. Organizationally, the two activities have traditionally been separate. The practitioners have difficulty communicating with one another not only because of differences in vocabulary but also because of some important differences in mind-set. This issue explores the question of whether auditing and evaluation are on convergent courses or whether the two disciplines will persist as distinctive services to decision makers. The chapters are based on presentations made at the International Evaluation Conference held in Vancouver, British Columbia, in November 1995. This is the 71st issue in the journal series New Directions for Evaluation.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
State Legislative Auditing and Evaluation
2 other sections not shown
Accounting Office achieved agencies American Evaluation Association analysis assessment audi Audit Commission audited bodies auditing and evaluation auditors blended approach budget CCAF Chelimsky clients comparing Comptroller costs criteria Crown Corporations decision makers developed Directions for Evaluation Divorski eval evaluation and auditing evaluation approach evaluation units examination example financial audit findings functions gram impact implementation important institutions internal investigation issues Jossey-Bass Publishers Leeuw legislative auditing Legislative Program Evaluation legislatures Majesty's Stationery Office ment methodological methods Michael Scriven mind-set NAO report National Audit Office organization organizational organizational learning particular performance audit performance measurement perspective political Pollitt problems professional program activities program audit program effectiveness program objectives public sector questions recommendations relationship Review Rist role SAIs social sciences staff systems and procedures technical Thousand Oaks tion topic tors traditional auditing approach U.S. dollars U.S. General Accounting University usually Wisler