Evaluation design for public defender offices
Roberta Rovner-Pieczenik, Alan Rapoport, Martha Lane, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, National Legal Aid and Defender Association
Dept. of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice : for sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1977 - Law - 436 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Disseminating Study Findings IIl9
6 other sections not shown
accused Administration adversary process agencies appeal Appendix in Team applicable e.g. assigned counsel assistance behalf of clients caseload charge Chief Defender clients contacted Code criminal justice system CRITERIA FOR COMPLIANCE Data Gathered debriefing Defender Case File defender office defender services Defender Staff Defenders Defender discussion docket study Effort toward change eligibility evaluation design evaluation team felony Final Report funding Goal his/her indigent individual INTERVIEW FORMAT jail judicial control lawyer management analyst misdemeanor Nature of Data Need for change Office operations on-site evaluation Opinion on objective organization parole performance Personnel plea plea bargaining policies and procedures political influence pre-evaluation private attorneys private counsel probation proceedings professional programs prosecutor public defender QUESTIONS POTENTIAL INDICATORS Representation on behalf request responsibility Review appropriate Appendix role sample selection sentence Subcontractor Team Captain Team Member Handbook tion trial U.S. Supreme Court unprofessional conduct