Expert evidence compared: rules and practices in the Dutch and American criminal justice system
In modern criminal trials, expert evidence often plays an important role. The question as to the guilt of the defendant is often contingent upon the results of DNA analysis, polygraphs, hair comparisons, and other forensic science techniques. At the same time, through a wide variety of problems inherent to the collection and production of such evidence, the use of expert evidence in criminal litigation is often highly problematical. The vast range of problems that have been identified over the years, and the manifest presence of these problems in some of the more notorious 'miscarriages of justice' have made expert evidence one of the most debated topics in legal literature today. Many believe that in this particular field, criminal justice systems are in dire need of legal reform. This study attempts to contribute to this debate through an analysis and comparison of two legal systems that each employ a different method for expert involvement. The study seeks to identify the similarities and differences in how different legal systems deal with expert evidence. Additionally it seeks to establish what the experiences of one country can bring to another for the purpose of enhancing the cornerstone of criminal litigation: the concept of procedural fairness.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
DEVELOPING VIEWS ON SCIENCE AND
ORIGINS AND STRUCTURE Or THE DUTCH CRIMINAL UsrIc1a System
CRIMINAL UsrIcE AND EXPERT EVIDENCE IN THE NETHERLANDS
8 other sections not shown
9th Cir admissible Amendment American criminal justice Amerikaanse analysis appeal appellate court appointed argued bewijs cert Code of Criminal Confrontation Clause constitutional Court held criminal defendants criminal justice system Criminal Procedure criminal processes criminal trials Daubert debate decided decision defendant's right denied dergelijke deskundige deskundigen deskundigenbewijs documents Dutch criminal justice Dutch Supreme Court e.g. HR e.g. United ECHR echter European Court evidentiary expert evidence Expert Testimony expert witness Federal Rules forensic science Frye Giannelli Gouda Gouda Quint hearsay rule Hielkema investigating judge jury lmwinkelried m.nt Nederlandse Netherlands niet Nijboer opinion parties police officers preliminary judicial inquiry pretrial prosecution prosecutor question recht regarding reliability rely require right to confrontation right to retest Rules of Evidence Scientific Evidence Sixth Amendment statements Strafvordering strafzaken supra note systems of law testify Thwvv trial court trier of fact Tweede Kamer U.S. Supreme Court verdachte violation Wetboek wordt zijn