Exploration and Meaning Making in the Learning of ScienceMountaineers, Rock Climbers, and Science Educators Around the 1920s, rock climbing separated from mountaineering to become a separate sport. At that time European climbers developed new equipment and techniques, enabling them to ascend mountain faces and to climb rocks, which were considered unassailable up to that time. American climbers went further by expanding and improving on the equipment. They even developed a system of quantification where points were given for the degree of difficulty of an ascent. This system focused primarily on the pitch of the mountain, and it even calculated up to de- mals to give a high degree of quantification. Rock climbing became a technical system. Csikszentmihaly (1976) observed that the sole interest of rock climbers at that time was to climb the rock. Rock climbers were known to reach the top and not even glance around at the scenery. The focus was on reaching the top of the rock. In contrast, mountaineers saw the whole mountain as a single “unit of perc- tion. ” “The ascent (to them) is a gestalt including the aesthetic, historical, personal and physical sensations” (Csikszentmihaly, 1976, p. 486). This is an example of two contrasting approaches to the same kind of landscape and of two different groups of people. Interestingly, in the US, Europe, and Japan a large segment of the early rock climbers were young mathematicians and theoretical physicists, while the mountaineers were a more varied lot. |
Other editions - View all
Exploration and Meaning Making in the Learning of Science Bernard Zubrowski No preview available - 2012 |
Exploration and Meaning Making in the Learning of Science Bernard Zubrowski No preview available - 2009 |
Common terms and phrases
abstract activities aesthetic analogies Antonio Damasio approach archetypical artists associated attention balance basic behavior body bottles bubbles chapter classroom cognitive concept conceptual change concrete connection constructivism context cultural described domain drawings drinking straws emotions empathy engagement environment examples experience exploration Faraday feelings food color formal gestures happen haptic holistic images inquiry interaction Intrinsic Motivation intuitive investigation involved kind kinesthetic Kreitler Learning of Science manipulations manner materials mathematical means metaphors movement moving multiple nonverbal objects observed pedagogical model pedagogical practices perception phase phenomena phenomenon physical play problem proposed Psychology relationship relevant role scenario schema science education scientific scientists sense sensory similar situation soap bubbles soap film somatic marker hypothesis Springer Science+Business Media structure symbols symmetry teacher teaching technological artifacts Technology theory thinking thought tion understanding verbal Visual Perception visual representations waterwheels Zubrowski