Expression Vs. Equality: The Politics of Campaign Finance Reform
In Expression vs. Equality, J. Tobin Grant and Thomas J. Rudolph argue that although public opinion plays a vital role in judicial rulings on the legalities of various finance reform options, political scientists have yet to realize fully the complexities and nuances of public attitudes toward campaign financing. The issue of campaign finance reform exposes a real conflict between the core democratic values of equality and expression. Economic inequalities, reformers argue, allow certain groups and individuals to exert undue influence in the political process, thereby threatening the democratic value of political equality. Opponents tend to frame the issue as a question of free speech: restrictions on campaign contributions are viewed as a threat to the democratic value of political expression. In the context of campaign finance, how do committed Americans rank the importance of equality and expression? How do they resolve the conflict between these competing democratic values? The answers to these questions, say the authors, depend heavily on whose influence and whose rights are perceived to be at stake. Using a series of unique experiments embedded in a national survey of the American electorate, they find that citizens' commitment to the values of expression and equality in the campaign finance system is strongly influenced by their feelings or affect toward those whose rights and influence are perceived to be at stake. Freedom of speech is more highly valued in contexts where the respondent agrees with the issue in question; equity, on the other hand, is more highly valued when the respondent disagrees with the issue. These findings have implications not only for the continuingpublic debate over campaign finance reform, but also for our understanding of how citizens make tradeoffs between competing democratic values.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
amendment attitudes toward campaign attitudes toward group BCRA Buckley campaign finance attitudes Campaign Finance Knowledge campaign finance reform campaign finance system chapter coefficients concern for group Contributions from _____ deregulatory reform Determinants of Support disliked group experimental conditions Federal Election Commission gay rights groups give to reforming group affect group influence group rights group-centric effects individuals issue frames issue of campaign issue salience John McCain labor unions least-liked condition least-liked group least-liked interest group low priority money frame money in politics most-liked condition most-liked group National Rifle Association ordered probit paign finance Political Efficacy political equality political speech political tolerance pro-choice pro-choice groups pro-life pro-life groups public opinion reform proposals reforming the campaign Republicans respondents rights and group rights and influence role of money salience of campaign soft money subsidized reform support for campaign support for group support for reform support for regulatory Trust in Government types of reform