Family Feuds: Wollstonecraft, Burke, and Rousseau on the Transformation of the Family
Compares the role of the family in the political thought of Rousseau, Burke, and Wollstonecraft.
Family Feuds is the first sustained comparative study of the place of the family in the political thought of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Edmund Burke, and Mary Wollstonecraft. Eileen Hunt Botting argues that Wollstonecraft recognized both Rousseau’s and Burke’s influential stature in late eighteenth-century debates about the family. Wollstonecraft critically identified them as philosophical and political partners in the defense of the patriarchal structure of the family, yet she used Rousseau’s conceptions of childhood education and maternal empowerment and Burke’s understanding of the family as the affective basis for political socialization as a theoretical foundation for her own egalitarian vision of the family. It is this ideal of the egalitarian family, Botting contends, that is one of the most important yet least appreciated legacies of Enlightenment political thought.
Eileen Hunt Botting is Thomas J. and Robert T. Rolfs Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Notre Dame.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
1 ROUSSEAU Champion and Critic of theTransformation of the Family
2 BURKES FEAR OF THE DESTRUCTION OF THE HIERARCHICAL FAMILY
3 BURKES PHILOSOPHICAL DEFENSEOF THE HIERARCHICAL FAMILY
The Three Stages of WollstonecraftsPhilosophy of the Family
Other editions - View all
aristocratic beautiful Burke’s citizens civic virtues civil corruption Corsica culture defense divorce domestic East India Bill Edmund Burke egalitarian egalitarian family egalitarian transformation eighteenth-century Emile and Sophie Enlightenment father female feminine foundation France French Revolution God’s hereafter cited hierarchical family hierarchies human husband Ibid inspire Jean-Jacques Rousseau Julie Letter little platoon marriage Mary Wollstonecraft middle Wollstonecraft modern moral and civic moral and political mothers nation natural affections novel Oeuvres ofthe one’s parents passions patriarchal patriarchal family patriotism philosophical political thought practice Preux primogeniture radical realm Reflections relationship republic revolutionary Rights of Woman Rights ofMen role romantic love Rousseau’s ideal Rousseauian rural family rural republican sex-role differentiation sexual social and political social bonds Social Contract society Socinian soul stonecraft structure sublime Susan Okin sympathy system of manners theological theory tion tradition University Press Vaud Warren Hastings Woll Wolmar women writings Wrongs of Woman
Page 7 - To be attached to the subdivision, to love the little platoon we belong to in society, ' is the first principle (the germ as it were) of public affections. It is the first link in the series by which we proceed towards a love to our country, and to mankind.