What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
abandoned abolition accepted admitted aldermen attempt ballot bill sent Bill was read Bishop Bishop of Exeter bribery Catholic Emancipation Church of England Church rates Commons sent concession consented Conservative Government constituencies Corporation Court declared defeat demand Devon Commission disfranchised Dissenters Dublin Police Bill English freemen Gladstone Government of Ireland hereditary House of Commons House of Lords insisted Irish discontent Irish Municipal Irish tenants justice to Ireland labourers Land Bill landlord later the peers legislation Lord Althorp Lord Derby Lord Salisbury Lords rejected Lords struck Lords threw lordships majority marriage measure ment municipal government Municipal Reform nation Nonconformists O'Connell opposition Parliament peers threw penal laws popular principle privileges Protestant read a second Reform Act Reform Bill refused registration rejected or mutilated Relief Bill repeal restored Roman Catholics Scotch Scotland Second Chamber second reading secure Select Committee session Statute-book tenant compensation Test Act tion Tithe town Upper Chamber veto voters
Page 47 - per voter per annum had been kept up for ten years. Direct bribery and wholesale treating prevailed to a frightful extent, and the House of Commons determined to make an example of the borough. But they reckoned without the peers. Lord Ashburton protested against the idea that a borough should be disfranchised for treating—
Page 17 - arisen from the inability of the English people to secure the acceptance of just laws for Ireland by the House of Lords until long after the opportunity had passed when concession might have been efficacious in removing discontent.
Page 52 - bill to a period of seven years. The same animus against secret voting showed itself the same year in the rejection outright of the proposal to elect school boards by ballot. The majority, however, was small, and the vote a few years afterwards was annulled by the Lords at the demand of a Conservative Government.
Page 27 - prompted them to resent every attempt to introduce English principles into Irish administration. They threw out the Dublin Police Bill in 1835, although by so doing they left the capital of Ireland a prey to lawlessness, because the corrupt clique called the Corporation had not been consulted. The same year they rejected, by
Page 53 - THE attitude assumed by the peers in relation to religious liberty has already been foreshadowed in the sketch of their dealings with the Catholic question. They have been the persistent, steady, and unwavering opponents of every recognition of the claims of Nonconformists to an equality of rights and privileges with Churchmen. On one occasion, and on
Page 14 - made an attempt to restore the clause abandoned in 1870 by the Compensation for Disturbance Bill of 1880. The bill passed the Commons, but in the Lords, although the peers were warned that its rejection would bring Ireland within a measurable distance of civil war, it was rejected by an enormous majority.
Page 53 - occasion only, have they shown themselves more Liberal than the House of Commons. In 1877 they surprised every one by voting in favour of destroying the monopoly of the graveyard, of which they had previously been the stoutest champions. It was but a momentary aberration. In 1880, when the Burials Bill came
Page 15 - To that vote can be traced the excessive exasperation of the tenants against their landlords which enabled Mr. Parnell to make the Land League supreme in Ireland and to intensify those feelings of national animosity which it has been the labour of generations of statesmen to efface. B 2
Page 38 - It was only an insult, but even an insult could not be surrendered without a pang. The same spirit of intolerance was even more painfully displayed in matters concerning the administration of justice. In 1839 the Lords, after long and angry debate, solemnly passed a