Financial Disclosure Act: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Administrative Law and Governmental Relations of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-fifth Congress, First Session, on H.R. 1, H.R. 9, H.R. 6954, and Companion Bills ... September 9 and 12, 1977
United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Administrative Law and Governmental Relations
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977 - Financial disclosure - 720 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action activities Administrative agency amended amount appearance appointed appropriate assets Attorney audit authority believe bill calendar candidate Chairman Commission Committee commodities Comptroller conduct conflict of interest Congress contract copy court Department designated determine direct Director duties effect employee employment established Ethics exceeds excess fails Federal file a report financial disclosure former gifts Government head held holdings House House of Representatives identity income individual Internal Revenue Code involved judge judicial Justice legislation matter means ment necessary occupies office or position officer or employee paragraph period person personnel preceding calendar prescribed President prohibition proposed provisions questions reasonable received referred regulations Representatives request required to file respect responsibility rules securities Senate Service spouse standards statement subsection term tion transactions trust United United States Code
Page 690 - In connection with any judicial or other proceeding, application, request for a ruling or other determination, contract, claim, controversy, investigation, charge, accusation, arrest, or other particular matter involving a specific party or parties in which the United States or the District of Colum40 CFR Ch.
Page 57 - ... particular matter involving a specific party or parties in which the United States is a party or has a direct and substantial interest and in which he participated personally and substantially as an officer or employee, through decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, the rendering of advice, investigation, or otherwise...
Page 496 - An employee shall avoid any action, whether or not specifically prohibited by this part, which might result in, or create the appearance of: (a) Using public office for private gain; (b) Giving preferential treatment to any person; (c) Impeding Government efficiency or economy; (d) Losing complete independence or impartiality; (e) Making a Government decision outside official channels; or (f) Affecting adversely the confidence of the public in the integrity of the Government.
Page 462 - If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this ; you must first enable the government to control the governed ; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.
Page 504 - ... or assist in the prosecution or support of any such claim, or receive any gratuity, or any share of or interest in any claim from any claimant against the United States...
Page 57 - States in connection with any judicial or other proceeding, application, request for a ruling or other determination, contract, claim, controversy, charge, accusation, arrest, or other particular matter Involving a specific party or parties...
Page 614 - ... particular matter in which, to his knowledge, he, his spouse, minor child, partner, organization in which he is serving as officer, director, trustee, partner or employee, or any other person or organization with whom he is negotiating or has any arrangement concerning prospective employment, has a financial interest — Shall be fined not more than $10,000, or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
Page 504 - States, shall act as an agent or attorney for prosecuting any claim against the United States...
Page 582 - In disposing of controverted cases a judge should indicate the reasons for his action in an opinion showing that he has not disregarded or overlooked serious arguments of counsel. He thus shows his full understanding of the case, avoids the suspicion of arbitrary conclusion, promotes confidence in his intellectual integrity and may contribute useful precedent to the growth of the law.