Food Stamp Program: refinements needed to improve accuracy of quality control error rates : report to the Chairman, Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate
The Office, 1986
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Adequate but Could The Service Properly Resolved Disagreements Over
5 other sections not shown
1984 error rates AFDC Program assessed authority to require basic program eligibility Calculating Error Rates Calculating Official Food calculating the penalty complete quality control complete reviews computer program Control Regulations Exclude correct error-rate calculations Exclude Certain Error-Prone fiscal year 1984 Food and Nutrition Food Stamp Program Georgia guidance headquarters officials Illinois included ineligible mathematical mistakes Midwest Midwest Region mistakes occurred Needs to Strengthen Northeast Region number of strata Nutrition Service official error rates official Food Stamp penalty for not-completed percent personal interview Procedures for Calculating program eligibility requirement Program error rates Quality Control Error Quality Control Regulations quality control reviews quality control samples quality control system regional offices Reviews Were Adequate sampling plans sampling procedures Service headquarters Service Needs Service officials Service regional Service regulations simple random sampling South Carolina South Dakota Stamp Program error statistical and mathematical stratified sampling Strengthen Its Procedures target Wisconsin dropped York