Force from Nietzsche to Derrida
Legenda, Modern Humanities Research Association and Maney Publishing, 2010 - Literary Criticism - 146 pages
"What is the pervasive character of the world? The answer is force." But, as Heidegger asks next: "What is force?" Connors sets out to answer this question, tracing a genealogy of the idea of force through the writings of Nietzsche, Heidegger, Foucault and Derrida. These thinkers try to pin down what force is, but know too that it is something which cannot be neutrally described. Their vigorously literary writings must therefore be read as much for the stylistic and rhetorical ways in which they render force's powerful elusiveness as for the content of their arguments. And it is perhaps literature, rather than philosophy, which best engages with force. Certainly, for Connors, these philosophical positions are foreshadowed in remarkable detail by Shakespeare's Henry V - a play shot through with forces, imaginary, military, rhetorical and bodily.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Force and Wil l
Force Power and History
Force and Impossibility
2 other sections not shown
adynaton afﬁrmation Apollonian argues argument Aristotle Aristotle’s articulated Cartesian cogito concept context coup de force criticism d’une Dasein Deconstruction deﬁnition Deleuze Derrida Descartes Descartes’s describes dialectical difﬁcult discourse discussed dynamic enaction energeia essay essence eternal return existence ﬁction ﬁgure ﬁnd ﬁrst ﬁrst place force’s forcelessness Foucault Foucaultian four thinkers Geburt Hegel Heidegger Heidegger’s impossible insofar Jacques Derrida knowledge Kraft language Leibniz literary literature London Macht madness Maney Publishing meaning metaphysical Michel Foucault model of force movement n’est Nietzsche Nietzsche’s notion offer ofthe once one’s ontological ousia Oxford Peggy Kamuf performative contradiction Phenomenology philosophical play of forces political position possibility potential present priori problem pure question reading relation relationship repetition rhetoric scientiﬁc seems sense signiﬁcation simply speciﬁc structure substance suggests takes temporal theory things thinking of force thought trans transgression understanding understood unforce University Press violence writing