Framers' Construction/Beardian Deconstruction: Essays on the Constitutional Design of 1787
Was the constitutional design of 1787 prompted by the desire of the Founding Fathers to protect their economic interests, as alleged by Charles Beard in his pathbreaking study in 1913, or was it perhaps attributable to the Framers' determination to overcome democratic turbulence in the states, as posited by the currently academically fashionable neo-Beardian school of historical interpretation? Neither thesis, Professor Slonim demonstrates, accords with the documentary record of the Constitutional Convention. Rather, the tension between the overarching need to create an effective national government and the desire to preserve state autonomy shaped the final result at Philadelphia. What emerged was a strong central government within a federal framework. Also analyzed in this volume are several neglected provisions and features of the 1787 constitutional design and their present-day implications.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Beards Historiography and the Constitutional
Extrajudicial Activities and the Principle
4 other sections not shown
adoption agst amendment American Antifederalists appointment Articles of Confederation authority branch Charles Beard Charles Pinckney choice cited clause Committee of Detail compromise Congress Connecticut Compromise Constitutional Convention Convention's corruption danger debate declared Delaware delegates democracy democratic discussion draft Economic Interpretation Edmund Randolph Elbridge Gerry Electoral College Emphasis in original executive Extrajudicial Farrand favor federal government federal powers Federalist foreign influence Founding Fathers Framers George Mason Gerry Gouverneur Morris Govt Ibid interests Jefferson Jersey Plan joint ballot judges judiciary legislative veto lower house Madison majority mode of electing motion national government national legislative veto national legislature negative noted personalty Philadelphia Pinckney political popular election President principle proposal provision Randolph Ratifying Convention Records reflected rejected remarks republican requirement role Senate separation of powers Slonim smaller South Carolina suggestion Supreme Court treaties treaty-making two-thirds Union United upper house Virginia Plan vote Washington Wood Wood's