Freedom of speech and press: exceptions to the First Amendment
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "Congress shall make no law... Abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...". This language restricts government both more and less than it would if it were applied literally. It restricts government more in that it applies not only to Congress, but to all branches of the federal government, and to all branches of state and local government. It restricts government less in that it provides no protection to some types of speech and only limited protection to others. This book provides an overview of the major exceptions to the First Amendment -- of the ways that the Supreme Court has interpreted the guarantee of freedom of speech and press to provide no protection or only limited protection for some types of speech. For example, the Court has decided that the First Amendment provides no protection to obscenity, child pornography, or speech that constitutes "advocacy of the use of force or of law violation... Where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action."
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
44 Liquormart access to ballot advertising regulations altemative Amendment protection apply strict scrutiny ballot counts beneﬁt buming Burson cable operators cable television Central Hudson test child pomography commercial speech compelled speech compelling interest Congress from prohibiting constitutional constitutionally content-based content-neutral Court found Court struck Court wrote defamation deﬁne deny media access Edge Broadcasting election emphasis in original employee employee’s exit polling expression Federal Communications Commission federal statute ﬁghting words ﬁnd ﬁnding ﬁrst fourth prong freedom of speech govemment govemmental interest incidental restriction intimidating justices least restrictive means lottery manner restriction media projections Miller test must-carry narrowly tailored necessary to serve obscene ofﬁcials Paciﬁca plurality political preclude Congress prior restraint prohibiting the media proscribe public concem public nudity radio and television reasonable ﬁt Rock Against Racism solicitation speech restriction state’s statute’s strict scrutiny sufﬁcient supra note Supreme Court held t]he Turner Broadcasting System unconstitutional upheld vote