Fundamental Rights Case: The Critics SpeakArguments questioning the validity of the amendments to the Constitution. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Written reply by petitioner | 50 |
Shri N A Palkhivala | 57 |
Prof P K Tripathi | 89 |
Copyright | |
2 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
25th Amendment abridge abrogated acquired Advocate amend the Constitution amending power amount argument Article 31-C Article 368 basic structure Chandrachud clause compensation conclusion conferred considered Constituent Assembly constituent power constitutional amendment construction contained contention decide decision destroy determining Directive Principles distinction Dwivedi effect elements essential features exercise expression fact fixed freedom fundamental rights give given Government ground Hegde held hold implied limitations important India interpretation judgment judicial review Justice Khanna legislative legislative power legislature majority Mathew matter meaning ment nature necessary object observed opinion ordinary Paras Parliament possible power of amendment Preamble procedure provisions question reasonable referred regard relating relied repeal respect restrictions result right to property rule Schedule scope Sikri six Judges social Supreme Court taken tion true valid word amendment
Bibliographic information
| Title | Fundamental Rights Case: The Critics Speak |
| Editor | Surendra Malik |
| Contributors | Kesavananda Bharati, India. Supreme Court |
| Publisher | Eastern Book Company, 1975 |
| Original from | the University of California |
| Digitized | May 25, 2007 |
| Length | 170 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |