Garner's Dictionary of Legal Usage
This new edition of Garner's Dictionary of Legal Usage discusses and analyzes modern legal vocabulary and style more thoroughly than any other contemporary reference work. Since the first edition, Bryan A. Garner has drawn on his unrivaled experience as a legal editor to refine his position on legal usage. The new Third Edition remains indispensable: Garner has updated entries throughout, while adding eight hundred new entries and new senses of existing entries, as well as thousands of new illustrative quotations from judicial opinions and leading lawbooks. Garner has also revised the selected bibliography, and expanded and updated cross-references to guide readers quickly and easily.
The GDLU now has much greater depth in particular areas of law, such as immigration and intellectual property. More examples from British English sources are included, to illustrate the similarities and differences between American and British English, and to aid readers using foreign common-law sources. Dozens of sets of near-synonyms that have long perplexed lawyers are now concisely defined and differentiated. Asterisks now precede words and phrases that are invariably inferior forms, making it easy for readers to tell which ones to avoid. A new category called Interpretation, Modes of, outlines the theories and defines the terminology of interpretation, also known as hermeneutics. Entries contain the most comprehensive glossary available for words and phrases related to legal interpretation. And, for the first time ever, sources are consistently cited throughout, with a solid majority of citations from post-2000. A new preface introduces the reader to this edition and discusses the extensive content that has been newly incorporated.
Influential writers and editors rely on Garner's Dictionary of Legal Usage daily. It is an essential resource for practicing lawyers, legal scholars, and libraries of all sizes and types, functioning as both a style guide and a law dictionary, guiding writers to distinguish between true terms of law and mere jargon and illustrating recommended forms of expression. Common blunders are discussed in ways that will discourage writers from any further use. The origins of frequently used expressions are described with engaging prose. Collectively, there is no better resource for approaching legal writing in a logical, clear, and error-free way.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
5th Cir action adverb agreement alleged ambiguity American appears applies attorney avoid back-formation cause Charles Alan Wright civil claim clause common law connotes constitutional contract Corp corporation counsel crime Criminal Law damages death defendant defendant’s denotes Dictionary dissenting distinction doctrine English equity evidence example F.Supp fact federal fee simple Fred Rodell Glanville Williams Grant Gilmore H.W. Fowler heirs hyphenated implied Int’l issue judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury Justice land language Latin law french lawyers legal contexts legal writing litigation means ment misused modern needless variant nonlawyers noun ofLaw ofthe one’s opinion party person phrasal adjective phrase plaintiff pleading plural preposition refer rule Scots law sense sentence sometimes spelling statute suggests Supreme Court synonymous term tion tive tort trial court trust U.S. Supreme Court usage usually verb William word writ