Geometric programming prediction of design trends for OMV protective structures
Robert A. Mog, J. R. Horn, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center. Structures and Dynamics Laboratory
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Division, 1990 - Mathematics - 14 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
a4 for various area and a4 area exponent a4 Area Exponent Figure area versus honeycomb core ratio versus decreasing design variables dual problem dual variables facing sheet mass-density facing sheet material function of a4 geometric programming method Geometric Programming Prediction globally optimal honeycomb core mass honeycomb core ratio honeycomb panel honeycomb structure configuration impact system constant independent variable linear constraints Marshall Space Flight mass per unit max v(8 minimum system mass monomial predictor monotonically increasing NASA Notation for honeycomb OMV Protective Structures Optimal first sheet Optimal honeycomb core optimal mass Optimal second sheet PARAMETRIC DESIGN TRENDS Performing Organization posynomial Prediction of Design problem formulations ratio versus honeycomb reduce the number second facing sheet second sheet mass sheet material density sheet ratio versus sheets and monotonically space debris Space Flight Center Technical Memorandum Trends for OMV unit area exponent unit area versus versus honeycomb core versus honeycomb mass versus impact system