George Fletcher's Essays on Criminal Law
While George Fletcher's book, Rethinking Criminal Law, is justly celebrated as the most widely cited and influential book on criminal law, his articles and essays have been comparatively overlooked. But it is in these essays where Fletcher hones and polishes the themes of Rethinking as well as advances new ground. They are critical in understanding the evolution of his views on criminal law. This volume collects, for the first time, a selection of his most famous previously published shorter works as well as some that are less known but equally important. Each of the twelve essays by Fletcher is paired with one or more new critical commentaries on that essay. These critical commentaries trace the significance of the respective essay in the development of the criminal law and assess its future significance. The commentators include leading criminal law scholars, philosophers, and a judge. Reflecting Fletcher's comparative law focus, the commentators hail from America, England, and Israel. Preceding these paired sets of essays/critical commentaries is an Introduction that broadly assesses Fletcher's body of work and career in criminal scholarship as well as provides an overview of each essay and critical commentary. Concluding the volume is a new, original essay by Fletcher in which he responds to his critics. Fletcher also reflects back on his six-decade spanning career and takes stock. Fletcher's essay concludes with some speculations as to the trend of future developments in the field. In the enterprise of theoretical criminal law, the essays in this book represent the pinnacle of the thinking of one of the fields' most celebrated scholars.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
CHAPTER 1 Introduction
CHAPTER 2 The Nature and Function of Criminal Theory
On The Nature and Function of Criminal Theory
MENS REA AND MISTAKE
JUSTIFICATION AND EXCUSE
Other editions - View all
action actor analysis argue argument attack believe beneﬁt Bernhard Goetz blackmail blame claims ofjustiﬁcation common law compensation concept conduct conviction courts crime criminal law criminal theory criteria culpability defendant’s defense deﬁning deﬁnition diﬂferent dominance duress eﬂfect eﬂfort elements ofthe essay evil excusing conditions fault ﬁeld ﬁnd ﬁre ﬁrst force German Greenawalt guilty H.L.A. HART harm Holmes homicide ifthe IMMANUEL KANT imminent imposed inﬂicted insanity intent issue justiﬁcation and excuse Kant Kant’s Kent Greenawalt killing LAW REVIEW law’s legal system material element matter mens rea Model Penal Code moral necessity negate negligence normative objective ofexcuses ofhis oflegal oﬂfense oﬂfers ofpunishment ofthe ofthese ofthis one’s philosophical principle problem prosecution psychotic aggressor punishment question rape recognize reﬂects response risk Rome Statute rule self-defense signiﬁcance standard strict liability suﬂfered suﬂﬁcient supra note Susan Estrich theorists thesis threat tion tort unjustiﬁed victim violation wrong wrongdoing