Getting the Government America Deserves: How Ethics Reform Can Make a Difference
In order to be effective, federal ethics law must address sources of systematic corruption rather than simply address motives that individual government employees might have to betray the public trust (such as personal financial holdings or family relationships). Getting the Government America Deserves articulates a general approach to combating systemic corruption as well as some specific proposals for doing so. Federal ethics law is relatively unknown in legal academia and elsewhere outside of Washington, D.C., but it is binding on over one million federal employees. Lobbyists, federal contractors, lawyers and others who interact with the federal government are also deeply interested in federal ethics law and represent a surprisingly large market for a little-studied area of the law.
Getting the Government America Deserves analyzes government ethics law from the perspective of an academic critic and that of a lawyer who was the chief White House ethics lawyer for two and a half years. Richard Painter argues that the existing ethics regime is in need of substantial reform since federal ethics laws fail to curtail conduct that undermines the integrity of government, such as political activity by federal employees and their interaction with lobbyists and interest groups. He also contends that in some other areas, such as personal financial conflicts of interest, there is too much complexity in regulatory and reporting requirements, and rules need to be simplified. Painter's solution includes strengthening the enforcement of ethics rules, reforming the lobbying industry, and changing a system of campaign finance that impedes meaningful government ethics reform.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Fiduciary Principle in Private and Public Law
Ethics Rules That Work When
Implementation and Enforcement of Ethics Rules
7 other sections not shown
Abramoff advocacy groups agency ethics officials appointed areas assets campaign contributions campaign finance candidates cials clients companies conduct conflict of interest contract contractors criminal disclose discussed in Chapter earmarks election entities ernment ethics law ethics rules example executive branch executive branch officials Federal Election Commission fiduciary principle financial conflict financial disclosure financial interest former gift rules government employees government ethics government lawyers government officials Hatch Act hedge funds influence insider trading interest statute investigation investment involved issues Jack Abramoff legislation lobbying firms lobbyists members of Congress ment mutual funds nominees nonpublic information official's organizations participate particular matter political activity political appointees political campaigns political fundraisers political parties problem prohibited prosecution QNCs recusal reform regulation representing back Sarbanes-Oxley Act Senate senior SGEs special purpose entities spouse systemic corruption think tanks tions transparency violation Washington