God and the Burden of Proof: Plantinga, Swinburne, and the Analytic Defense of Theism

Front Cover
Prometheus Books, 1989 - Philosophy - 156 pages
0 Reviews
Offers a critical examination of Alvin Plantinga's and Richard Swinburne's contemporary attempt to defend traditional theism within the context of analytic philosophy.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Section 1
7
Section 2
11
Section 3
17
Copyright

5 other sections not shown

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Abominable Snowman accept actualize agnostic Alvin Plantinga analytic philosophy Anthony Kenny Anthony O'Hear Antony Flew argue argument from evil arguments or evidence barber Bayes's theorem Bayesian confirmation theory belief in God Bermuda Triangle Bertrand Russell big bang Bigfoot brute fact burden of proof Calvinist cannot causal determination cause choices claim Colonel Blimp compatibilism composite particles containing moral cosmological argument create criteria for proper Curley cyanide David Hume deny disproof Elie Wiesel empiricism entities epistemic epistemology evidentialist challenge evil e Evil exists exist given existence of God explanandum explanation fact fair coin Faith and Rationality fingerprints Flew Flew's flying saucers foundationalism foundationalist FREE WILL DEFENSE fundamental particles Further G. E. Moore genetic disorders given that God God does God's existence grounds hadrons Hanson Hence history of science Hobbits However human Ibid incompatibilist Indeed infinite infinite series instance irrational J. L. Mackie justified Kai Nielsen knowledge language games Leibniz Loch Ness monster logical logically possible Mackie Mark Wallace Martin Gardner might moral evil murder natural evils natural theology neutrinos Nicholas Wolterstorff Norman Kemp Smith Norwood Russell Hanson obviously properly basic omnipotent ontological argument Paul Davies perfectly Perhaps Peter van Inwagen philosophers philosophy of religion physicists possible world postulating powers and liabilities presumption of atheism prima facie duty probability probability calculus problem of evil Prometheus Books properly basic belief quark model quarks rabies rational Richard Swinburne Saint Paul scientific secular humanist seems self-evident simply Smedes someone something sort statement Stephen Toulmin sufficient reason superfluous evil superforce Suppose Swinburne Swinburne's theistic belief theistic hypothesis theists theists and atheists theodicy therefore things Timothy Ferris tinga true ultimate uncaused universe

About the author (1989)

Keith M. Parsons is on the faculty of The University of Houston--Clear Lake, where he is Associate Professor of Philosophy and the recent winner of the President's Distinguished Research Award. His previous publications include the books God and the Burden of Proof (Prometheus Books, 1989), Drawing Out Leviathan (Indiana University Press, 2001), and The Great Dinosaur Controversy (ABC Clio Press, 2003). He holds a doctorate from the Department of History and Philosophy of Science of The University of Pittsburgh and a doctorate in philosophy from Queen's University (Canada). Dr. Parsons was the founding editor of the philosophical journal Philo. He has often served as a lecturer, debater, and workshop leader in a number of venues.

Bibliographic information