The use of God in moral debate is so problematic as to be almost worthless. We can argue with one another as to whether this or that alleged claim genuinely emanated from God, but surely it is better to leave God out of the argument and find strong human reasons for supporting the systems we advocate. We need a sensible and practical approach that will help us pick our way through the moral maze that confronts us in the pluralistic society we live in. Godless Morality offers exactly this—a human-centered justification for contemporary morality.
What people are saying - Write a review
Was the Trojan Horse Gay?
4 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
A.E. Housman abortion absolute abuse addicts alcohol ancient approach argue argument attitude authority behaviour believe Bible Britain called challenge chapter characterise choices Christian Church claim cloning command complex concept conflict consciousness consent Craiglockhart War Hospital created culture death debate difficult dilemma divine donor drugs embryo research ethic ethical calculus example experience Fertilisation fetus freedom genes genetic Gillian Slovo Gnosticism harm human sexuality important impossible Isaiah Berlin issue Jamie Bulger Jesus kind lives longer marriage moral panic moral relativism moral systems moral traditions morally problematic nature NRSV obedience obvious offer ourselves pain particular person principle probably prohibition recognise recreational drug relationship religion religious Richard Holloway role Schopenhauer scripture seems sense shagging social society species sperm struggle Stuart Blanch substances surrogacy taboo texts things Timnah tion understanding values virtue wife woman women wrong