Government Contractors Product Liability Act: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Administrative Law and Governmental Relations of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-fifth [i.e. Sixth] Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 5351 ... July 21, 1980
United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Administrative Law and Governmental Relations
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1981 - Government liability - 59 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accident activities agencies Air Force aircraft arising Association authorities basis believe bill Captain caused Chairman committee companies Congress contract Corporation cost cover damages Danielson death decision defective defense Department determined doctrine enactment equipment establishing fact fault Federal Tort Claims Feres foreign Geaghan going Government contractor Government's Harris hearing held immunity imposed increase indemnification indemnity injury involving Israel legislation limitations loss manufacturer matter McClory ment military Moorhead negligence objection parachute particular performance person premiums present problem product liability Public question received relief respect responsible result revised riser risk Rubin setting situation specifications standards statement statute Stencel Aero Engineering Subcommittee suggested suit supplied supplier Supreme Court Thank thing third parties tion Tort Claims Act ultimate United United States Government unusually hazardous
Page 32 - The contract is to be construed and the rights of the parties are to be determined by the application of the same principles as if the contract were between individuals.
Page 15 - Contractor) , or for death or bodily injury, not compensated by insurance or otherlse, arising out of the performance of the contract, whether or not caused by the negligence of the Contractor, his agents, servants, or employees, provided such liabilities are represented by final judgments or settlements approved In writing by the Government, and expenses Incidental to such liabilities, except liabilities (I) for which the Contractor is otherwise responsible...
Page 35 - To permit petitioner's claim would circumvent this limitation, thereby frustrating one of the essential features of the Veterans' Benefits Act. As we stated in a somewhat different context concerning the Tort Claims Act: "To permit [petitioner] to proceed . . . here would be to judicially admit at the back door that which has been legislatively turned away at the front door. We do not believe that the [Federal Tort Claims] Act permits such a result.
Page 12 - The association was established in 1944 at the instance of James Forrestal, then Secretary of the Navy and later the first Secretary of Defense. It is a non-profit, non-political...
Page 23 - I am more than eager to talk with him about it, and if there are any questions, I will be glad to try to answer them, Mr.
Page 29 - Mr. Chairman, members of the committee, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for the opportunity to speak on the issue of teacher quality.
Page 13 - Torts promulgated a special liability for selling a product in a defective condition which was unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer or to his property.
Page 40 - Mr. Chairman, and members of the committee, your hearings today are a significant step in assuring adequate protection and national recognition of the remarkable Sawtooth country. I am pleased to present to you the views of the Department of Agriculture on HR 6957 and to join in your consideration of the proposed Sawtooth National Recreation Area. The Department of Agriculture recommends and looks forward to prompt enactment of legislation to establish the Sawtooth National Recreation Area. Early...
Page 32 - Feres, the Supreme Court was faced with the question of whether or not...