Governmental Illegitimacy in International Law
When is a de facto authority not entitled to be considered a `government' for the purposes of International Law? International reaction to the 1991-4 Haitian crisis is only the most prominent in a series of events that suggest a norm of governmental illegitimacy is emerging to challenge more traditional notions of state sovereignty. This challenge has dramatic implications for two fundamental legal strictures: that against the use or threat of force against a state's political independence, and that against interference in matters `essentially' within a state's domestic jurisdiction. Yet although human rights advocates have begun to speak of state sovereignty as an `anachronism', with some expansively proclaiming the emergence of an international `right to democratic governance,' international law literature lacks systematic treatment of governmental illegitimacy. This work seeks to specify the international law of collective non-recognition of governments, so as to enable legal evaluation of cases in which competing factions assert governmental authority. It subjects the recognition controversies of the United Nations era to a systematic examination, informed by theoretical and comparative perspectives on governmental legitimacy. The inquiry establishes that the category of `illegitimate government' now occupies a place in international law, with significant consequences for the legality of intervention in certain instances. The principle of popular sovereignty, hitherto vague and ambiguous, has acquired sufficient determinacy to serve, in some circumstances, as a basis for denial of legal recognition to putative governments. This development does not imply, however, the emergence in international law of a meaningful norm of `democratic governance,' nor would such a norm serve the purposes of the scheme of sovereign equality of states embodied in the United Nations Charter.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
International Politics International Law
The paradox of sovereignty in international law
Legal Legitimacy in Theoretical Perspective
24 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
accordance acts African Angola Article Assembly assert assistance authority basis belligerent Chapter civil claim collective colonial consent constitutional coup credentials decision Declaration democracy democratic entitlement dictatorship domestic jurisdiction economic ECOWAS effective control doctrine elections electoral processes exercise facto force foreign freedom G.A. Res GAOR governmental illegitimacy Grenada Grundnorm Guinea-Bissau Haiti Haitian human rights Ibid ideological illegitimacy independence individual insurgency Int'l internal affairs international community international law international system interpretation intervention invasion issue Khmer Rouge Lauterpacht legitimacy legitimate liberal democracy liberal-democratic Lon Nol ment military MPLA Nicaragua non-intervention Nonetheless norms obligations opinio juris opposition Organization PAIGC party peace and security plen political community political participation popular sovereignty principle question regime representative Republic resolution respect revolutionary Rousseau ruling apparatus S.C. Res Sandinistas Security Council self-determination social Somoza sovereign equality state's status supra territory tion tional treaty U.N. Doc United Nations United Nations Charter violation vote