What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND ISSUES
THE NEED FOR GROUP LEGAL SERVICES IN AUSTRALIA
5 other sections not shown
167 Possible future 27 Baylor Law 34 All respondents 35 No need ABAJ adverse selection American Bar Association Bar Association Baylor Law Review benefits client closed panel schemes Commonwealth Legal Aid consulted a lawyer Delivery of Legal development of group employees group legal services group members group schemes health insurance involved Law & Soc Law Society lawyer usage lawyer/client relationship Legal Aid Commission legal assistance legal expense insurance legal insurance scheme legal practice legal problems legal profession Legal Service Plans legal service schemes Legal Services 1975 Legal Services Corporation legal services provided moral hazard need for group open panel schemes operation of group Pfennigstorf Possible future need Practice of Law practitioners premium Prepaid Legal Services providing legal services restrictions S.L. Kimball Scupi services in Australia Shreveport solicitors survey Table Taft Hartley Act Technical Report trade unions type of scheme Unauthorised Practice unmet legal need Victorian Yale L.J.