Guidelines for Extrasensory Perception Research
Laboratory tests of extrasensory perception have been going on for over 50 years, attracting international interest within the scientific community. Some scientists believe that these studies are well-conducted, and that positive results obtained support the existence of ESP. In contrast, critics have argued that there are serious methodological errors in such experiemnts and that their results should be ignored.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
analysis Beloff and Morris blind cheating Clairvoyance studies closed-deck studies Davis and Akers electronic RNGs errors ESP experiments ESP research ESP studies experimental records Extrasensory perception Faraday cages Ferrari free-response studies ganzfeld Hansen Hyman and Honorton J.B. Rhine Journal of Parapsychology judging set Kennedy and Uphoff knows the target laboratory personnel Marks and Kammann mentation meta-analysis methodological methods of randomisation Milton non-ESP open-deck studies outcome output Palmer Parapsychological Association participant's pre-specify precognition problem procedures Proceedings of presented pseudo-RNG Psychical Research Psychological random number tables randomness tests receiver's experimenter receiver's response recommend remote viewing response records safeguards Schmeidler scoring seed number sender's room Sensory shielding sequential dependence shielding III Society for Psychical someone special claimants special participants statistical tests study's suggests tamper-evident tampering target container target identity target list target package target records target selection target sequence target set telepathy studies trial-by-trial feedback trial's target Wiseman and Morris